HomeEmployee ExperienceDEI&BDiversity & InclusionAre we using the right tools to combat unconscious bias?

Are we using the right tools to combat unconscious bias?

  • 5 Min Read

With the workforce becoming increasingly diverse, it has never been more important that businesses ensure they have fair recruitment policies in place. But how do you remove bias from the recruitment process?

Featured Image

By James Meachin, Managing Psychologist, Pearl Kandola.

If a CV is on the borderline of what a recruiter is looking for, it’s twice as likely to be shown leniency and accepted if it belongs to a man with a white-sounding name, compared to one belonging to a man with an ethnic-sounding name; even if their qualifications and experience are exactly the same. This may sound like a fact from the last century, but we are still seeing all kinds of prejudice – not just racial – prevailing within the recruitment process.

Although very few of us would like to think that we might judge someone by their race or gender, to some degree, we all make decisions that are influenced by bias. This is because the majority of our decisions are the result of often unconscious thought processes, and recruitment is no different. In fact, this implicit bias has an overwhelming impact on the types of people who are awarded roles.

Whilst there are some firms making great progress in addressing this issue, we still aren’t close to where we should be. One reason for this, is that despite their proactivity, there are firms still implementing solutions that seem to tick all the right boxes in promoting a fair and unbiased process, but instead, are only exacerbating the issue.

A prime example of this are psychometric ability tests such as verbal and numerical reasoning. Whilst both these tests are often used, they are generic, and almost always harm the progression of minority candidates when compared to white candidates. An important reason for this is that these tests measure ‘crystallised intelligence’, which is our knowledge of facts (such as the best use of specific words). Candidates who are first- or second-generation migrants, or from less advantaged socio-economic backgrounds, may have strong potential whilst performing less well on these tests.

Another example is AI programmes. With the rise in online recruiting, they are becoming an increasingly common way to screen applicants, in theory, without the influence of bias because they are objective. However, there are many real-world examples showing how bias affects AI programmes, either through biased or unrepresentative datasets. One example of this was carried out by a civil liberties group using Amazon’s facial software to compare the photos of all federal lawmakers against a database of publicly available mug shots. Astonishingly, the test found the facial software incorrectly matched 28 members of Congress with people who had been arrested; a disproportional number of whom were African-American and Latino members.

In fact, there have been examples of facial recognition programmes that are unable to even identify black individuals as people. Joy Buolamwini, a black computer scientist and digital activist, put this theory to the test by wearing a white mask and found the programmes that previously wouldn’t recognise her, suddenly had no problem.

Automated processes clearly aren’t yet sophisticated enough to decide who should – or shouldn’t – be considered for an open position. In addition, the majority of these tests will ultimately result in a face-to-face interview if a candidate is successful, which simply delays human bias until this point.

Naturally, this situation is not much better at the interview stage. In an interview scenario, a recruiter might ask a candidate to describe an experience. The candidate might use a word, such as “challenging” which begins to paint a picture in the recruiter’s mind, but without specific details, there is room for their unconscious mind to fill the gaps with biased assumptions.

Many psychologists believe that the problem lies with ambiguity. Without realising, we are constantly trying to apply reason and logic to the world around us. As exemplified above, a recruiter will read a candidate’s CV and subconsciously build an image of their background and capabilities from their qualifications, their experience; even their name.

One way to counteract this is through situational judgement; i.e. asking candidates questions that will yield objective information, rather than vague or subjective answers. After every question, the level of evidence the candidate has supplied should be analysed and the candidate asked for more detail if needed. This allows our conscious brain to do most of the decision-making, minimising the potential for bias to fill in the gaps.

While psychometric ability tests have been found to significantly reduce the chances of some ethnic minority individuals, situational judgement tests have been found to provide a much more diverse range of candidates. Presenting interviewees with scenarios that they might encounter in their prospective role and asking them to explain how they would respond, is a great way of gaining a subjective impression of a candidate’s mindset. This makes sure that role requirements are clearly assessed, improving selection outcomes. These tests are also capable of ascertaining the future performance of candidates, ultimately saving employers time and money in hiring the correct talent straightaway.

So, whether it be for graduate or board-level appointments, we need to create processes that minimise the risk of human bias in the recruitment process. Simply making recruiters aware of their inherent biases isn’t enough. In order to eradicate bias altogether, there needs to be a conscious effort placed on understanding our decisions and equipping recruiters with the right set of tools.

Was this article helpful?

Related Articles

Embracing accessibility to foster inclusion and boost your bottom line

'My disability exists not because I use a wheelchair, but because the broader environment isn’t accessible.’ These are the words of comedian,...

  • Tamara Makoni
  • Jun 8, 2023

Micro-improvements, long-term strategy: Allyship in action with Donald Knight

[powerpress] The root word of allyship, explains Greenhouse Chief People Officer Donald Knight, is ‘All.’ “Allyship is, how are you inviting,...

  • HRD Connect
  • Jun 7, 2023

Is your DEI&B strategy textured enough for the evolving work landscape?

[powerpress] The diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging (DEI&B) landscape has evolved significantly, accelerated by culturally significant...

  • Benjamin Broomfield
  • May 24, 2023

Kim Crowder: Developing cultural fluency to establish workplace equity

[powerpress] Organizations can no longer ignore anti-racism imperatives. Firstly, and most importantly, all people in the workplace deserve to be...

  • HRD Connect
  • May 17, 2023

‘All In’ by 2027? Virgin Media O2’s five-year DE&I strategy one year on

[powerpress] Although inclusion and diversity are now ongoing initiatives at nearly all major organizations, to varying degrees of success, many...

  • Benjamin Broomfield
  • May 10, 2023

The cost of unequal access: Why and how to democratize coaching

If you’ve ever received coaching from an external party on workplace issues and opportunities, you have likely said to yourself that everyone...

  • Jenny Garrett
  • May 1, 2023

From upskilling to advocacy: The future of leadership development programs

Leadership development programs that promise to upskill and elevate women or other underrepresented groups frequently fail. Instead, they frustrate...

  • Benjamin Broomfield
  • Apr 27, 2023

The hidden talent market: Hiring people with disabilities

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, there were an estimated 41.1 million people in the United States living with a disability in 2019, just before...

  • Amy Waninger
  • Apr 18, 2023


HRD Roundtable: Combating 'Quiet Quitting'…

08 June 2023
  • E-Book
  • May 12, 2023

HRD Network Roundtable: The Retention…

15 June 2023
  • E-Book
  • May 12, 2023

Manage change and drive value…

01 June 2023
  • E-Book
  • May 12, 2023