HomeEmployee ExperienceDEI&BDiversity & InclusionThe perils of ignoring non-managerial staff

The perils of ignoring non-managerial staff

  • 4 Min Read

Many organisations are damaging employee performance, productivity, engagement and retention by not considering the needs of their frontline staff.

Featured Image

Many organisations are damaging employee performance, productivity, engagement and retention by not considering the needs of their frontline staff.

Two significant multinational research projects revealed that non-managerial staff were often disconnected from their job and workplace with only around one in three proud to work for the organisation.

This was in contrast to more senior management where engagement and attachment to the organisation increased substantially.

The results showed a remarkable difference in performance and attitude from those employees who felt empowered and supported and those who felt ignored and isolated.

More than 23,000 employees in 45 countries were questioned by IBM and Globoforce revealing that employers who were responsive to the needs of their staff saw significant improvements.

Workers with Employee Experience Index scores in the top quartile were more likely to report high levels of work performance than those whose scores were in the bottom quartile.


Connected leaders

The report noted that “employee experience has its beginnings in the direction and support of leaders and managers, who drive organisational practices that create the employee experience.

“Ultimately, a positive employee experience is associated with improved employee outcomes such as better job performance, increased discretionary effort and higher retention,” it added.

Discretionary effort was almost twice as high (95% compared to 55%) in environments which were strongly responsive to employee needs, suggesting a stronger employee experience can contribute to higher motivation levels to go beyond typical job duties.

Employees with less positive experiences were more than twice as likely to say they wanted to leave (44%) compared to those with much more positive experiences (21%).

Glassdoor: Moments of magic will build your brand


Quick fix

ibm-globoforce-voice-freedomThe reasons for this disconnect were varied but all focused on elements that could potentially be easily considered and corrected.

Staff who felt their ideas and suggestions mattered were more than twice as likely (83% vs 34%) to report a positive employee experience than those who did not and a similar pattern emerged among employees who have the freedom to decide how to do their work (79% vs 42%).

Only 56% of employees felt their senior leaders provided clear direction about where the organisation was headed.


Recognition and feedback

ibm-globoforce-recog-feedbackBeing recognised for good work was also critical as 83% of employees reported a positive experience when they felt recognised for the good work they did, compared to 38% that did not receive recognition.

“Engaged employees have pride in and are satisfied with their organization as a place to work, and they advocate for and intend to remain with their organization,” the report continued.

“However, employee engagement may not tell the whole story of the employee experience at work. In fact, employee experience and engagement go hand in hand to reflect employees’ states at work,” it added.


Majority dissatisfaction

These trends were witnessed in Oracle’s survey of Western Europe (1,200 workers from France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and the UK responded) where the majority of non-management level employees were dissatisfied with their workplace culture.

Just 37% of non-management employees were proud to work for their organisation; the sentiment for manager and director level employees was 70%.

This feeling of being ignored or less supported was expressed in several ways.

Just 22% of employees outside the management ranks felt their company was concerned with their overall well-being and less than one-third felt their business leaders were visible and approachable.

Only 25% of non-managers said their learning and training was specific to their personal development plan and only 22% said their company provided the technology and tools to promote their development.

The Generation Y myths busted


Senior engagement

In contrast, more than 60% of senior managers and directors felt their training was individually appropriate and nearly three-quarters had access to what they needed for development.

The result of this disconnect was a widespread sense of disillusionment among those in non-management positions with only 21% believing they could advance their career with their current employer and just 39% see a long-term future there.

The IBM-Globoforce survey also detected a shift in engagement and satisfaction between non-managerial and managerial employees.

It found that the more senior a responded was, the more positive the employee experience.

Individual contributors (employees who did not manage others) reported a lower level of

employee experience (63%) than managers (79%).

It noted that such a gap was not unique and other studies of worker opinions often found managers tended to have a more positive attitude to work than individual contributors.


Hear Hilton Worldwide VP of HR for EMEA Ben Bengougam answer ‘How do you make engagement happen?’ at the HR Directors Summit 2017.


Was this article helpful?

Related Articles

The time for task allocation is over: What are the four principal challenges of the modern manager?

The role of a modern manager is unrecognizable from its former self. Whereas the focus was once primarily on task allocation, the contemporary...

  • Wayne Clarke
  • Nov 28, 2023

Redefining work: How the anti-work movement challenges on workplace norms and what it means for job flexibility

At first, one might hear “anti-work” and think people don’t want to work anymore. While that might be the case in very few instances, the...

  • Traci Chernoff
  • Nov 22, 2023

Collaboration, coordination, cooperation: Thriving in the era of team-based work by differentiating teamwork types

Teamwork powers more and more of today’s work. Around the world, organizations are letting go of hierarchical structures and moving to teams-based...

  • Britt Andreatta
  • Nov 14, 2023

Josh Bersin: Talent scarcity isn’t going away. It’s time to re-think jobs altogether

It’s been another tough year for HR. Even the most optimistic HR leader would admit that issues such as talent scarcity are not going away and...

  • Josh Bersin
  • Nov 9, 2023

Spotify presses play on employee experience hyper-personalization with new platform 'Bounce'

[powerpress] Picture your music service recommending the perfect playlist as a soundtrack for an upcoming road trip. Or, as you hit shuffle,...

  • Benjamin Broomfield
  • Nov 8, 2023

Former NASA CHRO: What is AI’s impact on the "enigmatic" art and science of workforce planning?

Workforce planning is the most curious, enigmatic, and powerful of human resources functions. Unlike other HR disciplines, it has no clear...

  • Jane Datta
  • Nov 3, 2023

Blueprint: How to build a global leadership network for cross-location learning

In an era of re-globalization, there is a mounting necessity to ensure consistent leadership practices and knowledge sharing, irrespective of...

  • HRD Connect
  • Nov 1, 2023

Framework: Making the move from active to passive talent acquisition

How can organizations tap into the potential of candidates not actively seeking new roles? Some of the most valuable candidates are those...

  • HRD Connect
  • Oct 31, 2023


HRD Roundtable: Combating 'Quiet Quitting'…

08 June 2023
  • E-Book
  • May 12, 2023

HRD Network Roundtable: The Retention…

15 June 2023
  • E-Book
  • May 12, 2023

Manage change and drive value…

01 June 2023
  • E-Book
  • May 12, 2023