HomeEmployee ExperienceCultureWho should decide when and where to work?

Who should decide when and where to work?

  • 4 Min Read

Judging by the number of procedures and memos in most organisations, it is HR departments who help decide when and where people should work. By saying this to employees, companies broadcast a strong implicit message: “Work is where and when you are – not what you do”. This can lead to “presenteeism”, which costs companies even more than absenteeism.

Featured Image

Judging by the number of procedures and memos in most organisations, it is HR departments who help decide when and where people should work. By saying this to employees, companies broadcast a strong implicit message: “Work is where and when you are – not what you do”. This can lead to “presenteeism”, which costs companies even more than absenteeism.

Ensuring the employee is at his/her desk for 8 hours guarantees nothing but sitting. How can this change?

Chronic disengagement

This was invented during the Industrial Revolution in the Midlands and Scotland. It led to the outstanding increase in economic standards of living, which has multiplied 20-fold between 1825 and 2001. It also led to the chronic employee disengagement. According to Gallup, 68% of UK employees are disengaged, coming to work “in order to leave”, and 21% are actively disengaged.

One way in which HR often address the low engagement level is through work/life balance (WLB). Employees are provided with arrangements and perks which improve their lives: flexible work hours, work from home, leaves of absence, even sabbaticals. And thus, a full loop is closed: from HR procedures deciding for employees when and where to work, WLB decides for them when and where to live.

The problems with work/life balance

Beside the fact that some may consider that it is not a company’s business to organise their lives, there are two fundamental problems with the WLB. First, the emphasis on the “good life” sends an implicit message that work is bad. Yet, such message will hurt companies’ efforts to engage employees, not mentioning to build a “work-is-fun” workplace.

Second, WLB doesn’t alter the way employees are fundamentally treated. True, not worrying about being late to work is appreciated. Yet, it’s not you who decide when and where you work – it’s HR or managers. You are still treated as a child, in need of parents who “know what’s good for you”.

This paternalistic attitude does not always come from where you may think. For example, the management of a large corporation’s R&D unit sought to eliminate timeclocks to offer responsibility to their people. However, the union opposed the measure, arguing the danger of WLB through unaccounted overwork, not mentioning the unpaid extra hours.

Complete employee freedom

There exists a different, more natural way to (self-) organise work than WLB and arrangements negotiated between management and trade unions, handed down to employees. I call it the ‘liberated company’. By that I mean a work environment in which employees have complete freedom and responsibility to undertake any action they – not their superiors or procedures – decide is best for the business.

In a liberated company, employees are responsible and honourable adults who can be trusted to organise their work for the best of their company. Work is also part of life – in fact, the most important part, since we spend the majority of our waking hours there. Hence, not only the office working hours, but the production schedules are decided by the employees themselves.

In many liberated companies, hiring is done by the teams. In some, the annual salary increase is decided by employee representatives, and in a few companies salaries are chosen by employees themselves. Since all those are HR processes, the role of HR staff evolves in these companies too – from deciding for employees, to helping, coaching and supporting. In short, serving them.

Amazing results

I have studied and observed over 100 companies and public institutions, including Michelin, Airbus and two Belgian ministries whose leaders have transformed their traditional organisational models into liberated ones. It is not a model that you can impose, but a philosophy to articulate a company’s specific context by its leader and its employees, often with the help of HR.

The results are amazing. One CEO of a large insurer described speaking to an employee about his holidays and receiving the following answer: “Fine, but too long: couldn’t wait to get back.” Another CEO, of a large US privately-owned advertisement agency, walks daily through the offices at 6pm nudging: “Guys, go home, you have families”.

Like the R&D engineers before, the employees in liberated companies love their work and see it as an important – for some, central – part of their life. But unlike these engineers, they don’t have to hide it. In liberated companies they are able to find their own harmony between what’s meaningful to them in life.

It can be even called a work/life balance.

 

Author
Professor Isaac Getz,
ESCP Europe Business School, speaker, co-author of “Freedom, Inc.”

Was this article helpful?

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Related Articles

Employees are embarrassed about their financial literacy - HR teams should step up and support

Less than half (46%) of HR professionals foster a culture of openness about financial concerns, and only 16% of workers feel they have this kind of...

  • HRD Connect
  • Feb 23, 2024

Hybrid working is here to stay, so says HR

In recent years, businesses have had to adapt to the working arrangements to support their employees. The IT industry, in particular, has seen a...

  • HRD Connect
  • Feb 23, 2024

How organisations can create a culture of learning in 2024

Learning and development is an important part of any business – it helps retain employees and further business growth, essentially allowing...

  • HRD Connect
  • Feb 22, 2024

How HR teams can uproot workplace toxicity

The UK's Ambulance Service is facing serious accusations of bullying, harassment, discrimination, and a failure to address these issues...

  • HRD Connect
  • Feb 21, 2024

Avanti West Coast's menopause 'Gift Bag' sparks controversy

The conversation around menopause and its impact on women in the professional sphere has gained significant momentum. However, the recent approach...

  • HRD Connect
  • Feb 19, 2024

From picket lines to front lines: Rebuilding a post-strike workforce

The year 2023 saw some of the largest and most significant labor disputes in recent decades. For instance, the nearly four-month strike by the...

  • HRD Connect
  • Feb 19, 2024

72% of UK workers revealed they aren’t considering moving jobs in 2024

Key findings: A quarter of Brits have been in their current job for 1-3 years. Over three-quarters of respondents shared that they are happy...

  • HRD Connect
  • Feb 19, 2024

What can dating teach us about management?

As Valentine’s Day approaches, we’re alerted again to the new dating trends (hello, ‘slow-dating’), terms (know your zombie-ing from your...

  • Laura Ashley-Timms
  • Feb 13, 2024

Events

HRD Roundtable: Combating 'Quiet Quitting'…

08 June 2023
  • E-Book
  • May 12, 2023

HRD Network Roundtable: The Retention…

15 June 2023
  • E-Book
  • May 12, 2023

Manage change and drive value…

01 June 2023
  • E-Book
  • May 12, 2023
Sign up to our Newsletter