HomeUncategorizedUK government’s Lifetime Provider pension model meets criticism

UK government's Lifetime Provider pension model meets criticism

  • 3 Min Read

The ABI stresses the need for thorough scrutiny of the potential impacts on savers, providers, and employers, and suggests implementing other measures first, such as the pensions dashboards project.

Featured Image

The Association of British Insurers (ABI) has issued a cautionary statement regarding the UK government’s proposals to introduce lifetime provider models into the workplace pension system. The ABI, a leading voice in insurance and long-term savings, has expressed concerns that these changes could significantly alter the current market dynamics.

The government’s proposal aims to address the growing number of small pension pots and increase engagement by introducing lifetime provider models through two methods: member choice and pot for life.

The member choice model would allow employees to request their employer to pay their contributions into a pension pot of their choice. The pot for life model would mean employees remain in the first pension scheme they started saving into at the beginning of their career, unless they choose to move.

The ABI has highlighted that these methods would represent a significant departure from the current automatic enrolment system. The automatic enrolment system was primarily established to assist those who were not saving into a pension, many of whom were lower-paid individuals. The ABI has stressed the importance of thoroughly scrutinising and understanding the real-world market impacts of these proposals on savers, providers, and employers.

While the lifetime provider models could potentially increase personal ownership of pensions and reduce the number of pension pots, the ABI has suggested that the pensions dashboards project, value for money framework, and default consolidators should be implemented first. These measures are already set to increase engagement, reduce the number of small pots, and ensure all schemes offer good value.

What does it all mean?

The transition to lifetime provider models would be a long-term project, requiring significant new investment in central infrastructure.

The ABI has pointed to the experience with the pensions dashboards project as an example of the complexity of making wholesale changes to the UK’s pensions architecture, particularly where IT infrastructure changes are required.

In a statement, Rob Yuille, head of Long-Term Savings Policy at the ABI, emphasised the need for clarity on how new policies will affect the current system and improve outcomes for all savers. He also highlighted the importance of not losing sight of the success of automatic enrolment and the need for key reforms, such as pensions dashboards, to be completed.

Yvonne Braun, director of Long-Term Savings Policy at the ABI, added that while lifetime provider models could help tackle low pension engagement, more analysis is needed to understand the real-world impact of the proposals on savers, employers, and pension providers.

The ABI’s response to the government’s proposals underscores the importance of careful consideration and thorough analysis in the implementation of changes to the pension system. As HR professionals, it is crucial to stay informed about these developments and their potential impacts on employees’ long-term savings and retirement planning.

Was this article helpful?

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Related Articles

Growth glimmers from SMEs as they adapt recruitment approach to counter cost-of-living pressure

A new report into the skills and recruitment challenges of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) reveals that businesses plan to invest in their...

  • HRD Connect
  • Feb 6, 2024

Three quarters of HR leaders say cost of living pressures are impacting workplace performance

New research investigating how cost of living pressures are impacting the workforce has found that three quarters (74%) of HR leaders fear the cost...

  • Rachael King
  • Feb 2, 2024

How to choose the right EdTech provider for your business?

EdTech has emerged as a game-changer for businesses looking to enhance their learning and development programs. However, choosing the right EdTech...

  • HRD Connect
  • Jan 18, 2024

How about a three day weekend, every week?

The four-day work week has been a topic of increasing interest in recent years, with a number of countries and companies experimenting with this new...

  • HRD Connect
  • Jan 11, 2024

Cracking to code on hiring overseas

As businesses continue to expand their global footprint, the need to hire overseas workers has become increasingly prevalent. This process, however,...

  • HRD Connect
  • Jan 11, 2024

Making work ‘worth it’ – engaging and retaining talent

The effects of the 'Great Resignation' are still being felt today. Employees everywhere are rethinking their “worth it” equation and are taking...

  • Microsoft
  • Apr 13, 2022

How to take a data-driven approach to employee retention

Employee retention is a critical aspect of any thriving organization. When employees feel valued and satisfied with their job, retention, and...

  • HRD Connect
  • Mar 4, 2022

6 steps to wellbeing communication success

Customised communication is seen as the best way to integrate benefits into wellbeing strategies, according to two fifths (42 percent) of UK...

  • Legal & General | Sponsored
  • Feb 17, 2022


HRD Roundtable: Combating 'Quiet Quitting'…

08 June 2023
  • E-Book
  • May 12, 2023

HRD Network Roundtable: The Retention…

15 June 2023
  • E-Book
  • May 12, 2023

Manage change and drive value…

01 June 2023
  • E-Book
  • May 12, 2023
Sign up to our Newsletter