HomeUncategorizedUK government’s Lifetime Provider pension model meets criticism

UK government's Lifetime Provider pension model meets criticism

  • 3 Min Read

The ABI stresses the need for thorough scrutiny of the potential impacts on savers, providers, and employers, and suggests implementing other measures first, such as the pensions dashboards project.

Featured Image

The Association of British Insurers (ABI) has issued a cautionary statement regarding the UK government’s proposals to introduce lifetime provider models into the workplace pension system. The ABI, a leading voice in insurance and long-term savings, has expressed concerns that these changes could significantly alter the current market dynamics.

The government’s proposal aims to address the growing number of small pension pots and increase engagement by introducing lifetime provider models through two methods: member choice and pot for life.

The member choice model would allow employees to request their employer to pay their contributions into a pension pot of their choice. The pot for life model would mean employees remain in the first pension scheme they started saving into at the beginning of their career, unless they choose to move.

The ABI has highlighted that these methods would represent a significant departure from the current automatic enrolment system. The automatic enrolment system was primarily established to assist those who were not saving into a pension, many of whom were lower-paid individuals. The ABI has stressed the importance of thoroughly scrutinising and understanding the real-world market impacts of these proposals on savers, providers, and employers.

While the lifetime provider models could potentially increase personal ownership of pensions and reduce the number of pension pots, the ABI has suggested that the pensions dashboards project, value for money framework, and default consolidators should be implemented first. These measures are already set to increase engagement, reduce the number of small pots, and ensure all schemes offer good value.

What does it all mean?

The transition to lifetime provider models would be a long-term project, requiring significant new investment in central infrastructure.

The ABI has pointed to the experience with the pensions dashboards project as an example of the complexity of making wholesale changes to the UK’s pensions architecture, particularly where IT infrastructure changes are required.

In a statement, Rob Yuille, head of Long-Term Savings Policy at the ABI, emphasised the need for clarity on how new policies will affect the current system and improve outcomes for all savers. He also highlighted the importance of not losing sight of the success of automatic enrolment and the need for key reforms, such as pensions dashboards, to be completed.

Yvonne Braun, director of Long-Term Savings Policy at the ABI, added that while lifetime provider models could help tackle low pension engagement, more analysis is needed to understand the real-world impact of the proposals on savers, employers, and pension providers.

The ABI’s response to the government’s proposals underscores the importance of careful consideration and thorough analysis in the implementation of changes to the pension system. As HR professionals, it is crucial to stay informed about these developments and their potential impacts on employees’ long-term savings and retirement planning.

Was this article helpful?

Subscribe to get your daily business insights


HRD Roundtable: Combating 'Quiet Quitting'…

08 June 2023
  • E-Book
  • 1y

HRD Network Roundtable: The Retention…

15 June 2023
  • E-Book
  • 1y

Manage change and drive value…

01 June 2023
  • E-Book
  • 1y
Sign up to our Newsletter